How can the media (Fox News) get away with their obvious lies?
Archer Radcliffe Mar. 7 0Fox News has been accused of lying to their viewers by presenting them with false information. This has raised questions about how they are able to continue doing this without facing consequences. The answer lies in the legal concept of “actual malice” which states that a publisher can only be held legally liable for defamation if they knew their statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Fox News has been able to successfully defend themselves in court due to their lawyers’ ability to prove that they did not knowingly publish false information and acted responsibly in the process. Additionally, Fox News has been able to take advantage of their position as a news outlet, which gives them more freedom of speech than other companies. This allows them to push the boundaries of what is considered acceptable behavior without facing legal repercussions.
More Detail
Milei’s Party Wins Argentine Midterms With 41% Vote, Seizes Legislative Power
Javier Milei's La Libertad Avanza won 41% of Argentina's 2025 midterm vote, securing legislative control to push dollarization, spending cuts, and privatizations without coalition support.
West Ham sacks Graham Potter, Nuno Espírito Santo steps in
West Ham United fired Graham Potter on Oct 13, 2024 after a poor home run, appointing Nuno Espírito Santo. Former Hammers star Stuart Pearce predicts Potter may head abroad.
No Evidence of Ireland’s Five-Card Rugby Incident Against South Africa, Experts Confirm
No credible report exists of Ireland receiving five cards against South Africa in rugby. Experts confirm the incident is impossible under World Rugby rules, and no such match occurred. The myth stems from misattributed footage and online misinformation.