Tag: cnn
Why do Trump supporters think CNN is fake news?
Archer Radcliffe Jul. 20 0From my understanding, many Trump supporters believe CNN to be "fake news" because they perceive a consistent bias against Trump in their reporting. They see the network as dismissive of his achievements and overly critical of his mistakes. They often point to examples of what they feel is selective coverage or misrepresentation of facts. Many also feel that CNN's focus on Trump's controversial statements and actions overshadows substantial issues. Lastly, Trump's own repeated labeling of CNN as "fake news" has certainly influenced his followers' opinions.
More Detail
Which news outlet is more extreme Fox News or CNN?
Archer Radcliffe Feb. 10 0This article examines the differences between the two major news outlets in the US, Fox News and CNN. It looks at their political leanings, the topics they cover, and how they present the news. Both networks are seen as having a strong political bias, with Fox News leaning to the right, while CNN is perceived as more center-left. Fox News is often criticized for its focus on sensationalism, while CNN is known for its more comprehensive coverage of world events. Ultimately, the article concludes that both networks have their pros and cons, and it's up to the viewer to decide which one is more extreme.
More DetailRecent posts
Which is faster in delivering news, Twitter or Google?
In today's fast-paced world, staying updated with current events is crucial. After comparing Twitter and Google, I've come to the conclusion that Twitter is faster in delivering news. This is because news breaks and spreads rapidly on Twitter through users and hashtags. Additionally, Twitter's real-time feed allows for instant updates. On the other hand, Google relies on indexing news articles, which takes time and might not always be up-to-date.
How can the media (Fox News) get away with their obvious lies?
Fox News has been accused of lying to their viewers by presenting them with false information. This has raised questions about how they are able to continue doing this without facing consequences. The answer lies in the legal concept of “actual malice” which states that a publisher can only be held legally liable for defamation if they knew their statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Fox News has been able to successfully defend themselves in court due to their lawyers’ ability to prove that they did not knowingly publish false information and acted responsibly in the process. Additionally, Fox News has been able to take advantage of their position as a news outlet, which gives them more freedom of speech than other companies. This allows them to push the boundaries of what is considered acceptable behavior without facing legal repercussions.
The Role of Standardized Testing - Examining the pros and cons
Hi, it's me again. I've got something really thought-provoking to share today. We're delving into standardized testing in the education system - its pros, its cons, and how it impacts students and educators alike. From the undeniable benefits they bring in measuring learning objectively to the criticisms of their potentially limiting nature - we're exploring it all. If you've ever wondered about the role and impact of these tests, this post is for you!